
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wish List: Creative Compacts, Canon G10 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robnunnphoto.com/wish-list-creative-compacts-canon-g10-and-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/997/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robnunnphoto.com/wish-list-creative-compacts-canon-g10-and-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/997/</link>
	<description>AKA Scalespeeder. Home Of The SCL Photo Podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:48:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob_Nunn</title>
		<link>http://www.robnunnphoto.com/wish-list-creative-compacts-canon-g10-and-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/997/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob_Nunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robnunnphoto.com/?p=997#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Hi Victor,

If M.Bresson was still with us, and returned to Photography, maybe he&#039;d be shooting with one of these - perfect for candids...

Cheers, Rob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Victor,</p>
<p>If M.Bresson was still with us, and returned to Photography, maybe he&#8217;d be shooting with one of these &#8211; perfect for candids&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers, Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.robnunnphoto.com/wish-list-creative-compacts-canon-g10-and-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/997/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robnunnphoto.com/?p=997#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Now this is how I would like a camera to look like and what I expected from a digital camera.

Makes me ponder back to the range-finder cameras such as the Leicas. 
I used to have an old Agfa Isolette III folding medium format with rangefinder, (albeit uncoupled), that I loved having in my pocket. (Should never have sold it!!)

Nothing better than a decent quality camera that slips in the pocket just ready for some impromptu shooting.

Just like the Lecias though, these have a pretty big price tag. When you look at the average consumer camera, (seen the new Olympus crystal? disgusting fashion accessory type thing!), I can&#039;t see the price of these dropping too much unfortunately.

If money was no object I think I&#039;d prefer the Canon, but at that price I could buy a Sony dSLR with two lenses - but it wouldn&#039;t fit in my pocket!

You and your wish lists Mr. Nunn.....Makes me get back into the &#039;camera porn&#039; side of things dribbling over cameras like this!

All the best, Victor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is how I would like a camera to look like and what I expected from a digital camera.</p>
<p>Makes me ponder back to the range-finder cameras such as the Leicas.<br />
I used to have an old Agfa Isolette III folding medium format with rangefinder, (albeit uncoupled), that I loved having in my pocket. (Should never have sold it!!)</p>
<p>Nothing better than a decent quality camera that slips in the pocket just ready for some impromptu shooting.</p>
<p>Just like the Lecias though, these have a pretty big price tag. When you look at the average consumer camera, (seen the new Olympus crystal? disgusting fashion accessory type thing!), I can&#8217;t see the price of these dropping too much unfortunately.</p>
<p>If money was no object I think I&#8217;d prefer the Canon, but at that price I could buy a Sony dSLR with two lenses &#8211; but it wouldn&#8217;t fit in my pocket!</p>
<p>You and your wish lists Mr. Nunn&#8230;..Makes me get back into the &#8216;camera porn&#8217; side of things dribbling over cameras like this!</p>
<p>All the best, Victor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob_Nunn</title>
		<link>http://www.robnunnphoto.com/wish-list-creative-compacts-canon-g10-and-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/997/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob_Nunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robnunnphoto.com/?p=997#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Hi Travis,

Thats brilliant, the Panasonic looks very tempting indeed.

Cheers, Rob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Travis,</p>
<p>Thats brilliant, the Panasonic looks very tempting indeed.</p>
<p>Cheers, Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Good</title>
		<link>http://www.robnunnphoto.com/wish-list-creative-compacts-canon-g10-and-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/997/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robnunnphoto.com/?p=997#comment-365</guid>
		<description>I chose the LX3 and have been thrilled by the images it takes. The lack of viewfinder, the shallow zoom, and the lens cap are small negatives when you can take a 16x9 shot at 24mm in low light and get excellent results. If you don&#039;t need telephoto or, as in my case, you can compliment your telephoto with an excellent wide angle point-and-shoot then the LX3 is worth considering. After a month, I&#039;m VERY pleased with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I chose the LX3 and have been thrilled by the images it takes. The lack of viewfinder, the shallow zoom, and the lens cap are small negatives when you can take a 16&#215;9 shot at 24mm in low light and get excellent results. If you don&#8217;t need telephoto or, as in my case, you can compliment your telephoto with an excellent wide angle point-and-shoot then the LX3 is worth considering. After a month, I&#8217;m VERY pleased with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
